Arsenal's victory over Sporting CP on Tuesday night was overshadowed by a fresh injury concern for captain Martin Odegaard. The Norwegian playmaker was forced off in the second half of the Champions League quarterfinal first leg clash, leaving fans and pundits alike sweating over his fitness at a critical juncture of the season. More fitness woes for the Gunners captain Odegaard has endured a stop-start campaign defined by physical setbacks, having already missed 121 days and 23 matches for the Gunners this term. After a spell on the sidelines following a February injury in the north London derby against Tottenham, he had only recently returned to the fold, making an appearance against Southampton in the FA Cup before starting in Lisbon. However, the 27-year-old went down in the 70th minute against Sporting and required medical treatment before being substituted. While Kai Havertz came on to replace him and scored a 90th-minute winner, the sight of Odegaard clutching his leg has sparked major panic back in his homeland. 'Horror movie' images cause alarm Former Norway defender Jesper Mathisen, speaking to TV2, expressed his dread after watching the broadcast, with one eye on his country's upcoming World Cup campaign. "Those are scary images. Like watching a horror movie. A nightmare. Hes not sitting down for no reason. It would have been a big loss for both Arsenal and Norway if he had to go out with an injury again," Mathisen explained. Despite the initial fear, there was a glimmer of hope as Odegaard was later seen celebrating with his teammates after the final whistle. Nevertheless, with five separate injuries recorded this season, the recurring nature of his fitness issues is becoming a significant narrative for Mikel Arteta's side as they pursue European and domestic glory. Growing concerns over 'wear and tear' Odegaard's lack of continuity has led some observers to wonder if the 27-year-old is beginning to suffer from the physical demands of a career that began in the professional ranks at just 15. Former Norway international Kjetil Rekdal is among those who believe the midfielders early start in senior football might be a factor. "Of course it is worrying," he said, per SportWitness. "It could mean that the wear and tear is starting to take its toll on his body. Maybe he does not have such a long career in his 30s and up, like others who started senior football later. "It could be bad luck, but he has had a lot of breaks now. A player who is injured does not get to deliver anything at all. The most important thing is that he gets to train well before he plays matches again." What comes next? While the squad demonstrated resilience to win in Portugal, another extended absence for their captain would force a tactical rethink as Arsenal prepare for upcoming Premier League fixtures and a pivotal Champions League second leg at the Emirates. It remains to be seen if Odegaard will return in time for the Gunners' clash with Bournemouth on Saturday.

Former India captain and ex-BCCI president Sourav Ganguly has backed Mohammed Shami for an India comeback, advocating that the out-of-favour pacer should be bowling alongside Jasprit Bumrah

Who among the 91 players in this year's Masters field has an actual chance to slip on the green jacket?

Rutgers big man Baye Fall has entered the NCAA transfer portal, per On3s Pete Nakos. Hes a former four-star recruit who started his carrer at Arkansas.To keep up with the latest players on the move, check out On3s Transfer Portal wire. The On3 Transfer Portal Instagram account and Twitter account are excellent resources to stay up to date with the latest moves.

Hansi Flick raged that Barcelona should have been given a penalty and Marc Pubill sent off after his team crashed to a 2-0 defeat to Atltico Madrid at Spotify Camp Nou in the Champions League on Wednesday.

Watch the Shield Curling Club and the Typhoon Curling Club go head-to-head in Rock League action from the Mattamy Athletic Centre in Toronto.

A potential clue over Zak Butters looming free agency call. Plus a Hawks free agent and in-demand Crow have spoken on their futures. MORE IN TRADE WHISPERS.

The Atlanta Falcons have lost one crucial piece on their offensive line, but have gained another in his absence.

The papers on Thursday focus on the aftermath of the two-week ceasefire deal agreed between the US, Israel and Iran.

A woman gave birth midair Friday on a flight from Kingston, Jamaica, to New York, turning a routine plane trip into a high-altitude drama.The mother aboard a Caribbean Airlines flight had a successful delivery, as Fox News Digital previously reported but shortly after the unexpected arrival, a hot debate about the baby's citizenship commenced."Sometimes, when a child is not born in a hospital and there's no birth record, that can create problems," Cyrus D. Mehta, a New York-based immigration attorney told Fox News Digital. (He is not connected to the Caribbean Airlines case.)FLIGHT PASSENGERS SLAM AIRLINES FOR PUSHING EARLY BAG CHECKS EVEN WITH EMPTY BINS ON BOARDEven so, he added, "it's very clear. If you're born in the territory of the United States, even if it's on an airplane, you are a citizen," he continued."The question is: What constitutes U.S. airspace?" he also said.Commenters online debated the issue."Is this baby an American?" wrote one person. "Was it born in American airspace? Does that qualify? Seems every other situation possible qualifies under the birthright citizenship. What a joke!"Said another person about the Caribbean Airlines birth, "If the parents are American citizens, then the baby is."CLICK HERE FOR MORE LIFESTYLE STORIESWrote another commenter, "Good example of why the [Supreme Court] needs to rule Trump's [executive order] as valid. These are not isolated cases they happen every day of the week. Non-citizens know they'll win the lottery if they can give birth while in the U.S."Caribbean Airlines notes on its website that expectant mothers can travel on their planes without a doctors approval until the end of their 32nd week of pregnancy but travel is not permitted beyond the 35th week.Even so, incidents in which women give birth on flights are very uncommon.A March 2020 study published by the Journal of Travel Medicine found that between 1929 and 2018, there were 74 in-flight births across 73 commercial flights with 71 of those newborn infants surviving.TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZThe primary reason most airlines do not want pregnant women to fly very late in their pregnancies is medical.Other procedural issues can occur as well, Mehta said.Proof of the precise location of the plane during childbirth midair and the moment the baby is born can be challenging.The government requires a log from an airline or ship "reflecting the latitude and longitude when the birth occurred," Mehta said."The parent is responsible for reporting the birth to authorities" and the parents will need a birth certificate if they want to obtain a passport for the child, he added.Caribbean Airlines said that, while the birth aboard its flight was unexpected, the crew never declared an emergency during the trip.Instead, the airline praised its crew, who "managed the situation in accordance with established procedures, ensuring the safety and comfort of all onboard."CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTERThe airline said the woman and newborn received the care they needed from medical personnel.The unusual childbirth comes at a time of heated discussion about citizenship laws in the United States.The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments on a challenge to President Donald Trumps Executive Order 14160, which limits birthright citizenship in the U.S.Section one of the 14th Amendment automatically grants citizenship to all persons born in the United States.The courts have routinely upheldbirthrightcitizenshipfor over a century.Ashley J. DiMella and Lorraine Taylor, both of Fox News Digital, contributed reporting.