How Referee Improvements Are Helping World Cup Matches 'Flow Better'
The 2026 FIFA World Cup has featured exciting end-to-end play, highlighted by a few rules-related moments and maybe some fan questions about what's going on. Some of that is a result of the class of the players on the pitch, but also the officials' ability to manage the match. Referees have balanced dealing penalties in the form of handing out six red cards through just more than 30 matches while giving space for physicality. They've carried out FIFA's newly implemented measures to disincentivize time-wasting and improve the speed and flow of matches. The best referees pick their spots, allowing the stars to shine. "What we have seen in this World Cup is the games played in a better way, the game has flowed better," FOX Sports rules analyst Mark Clattenburg said during the halftime show of Saturday's match between Germany and Ivory Coast. Clattenburg was an English Premier League official for more than a decade and is now a FOX Sports' broadcaster, adding commentary to explain crucial referee decisions at the World Cup. Three of the main topics he's alluded to include red-card assessment, time-wasting techniques and advancements to the video assistant review system. Red Cards All six red cards that have been given out at the 2026 FIFA World Cup have been straight red cards. Each was handed down because of physical contact, except for a recent one, which was assessed to Paraguay midfielder Miguel Almirn on Friday. Almirn was penalized after covering his mouth while communicating with Trkiye's Mert Mldr. The action might seem trivial, as Almirn didn't physically impede Mldr, and it's unclear what he said. But this is a direct example of a new infringement that leads to a red card in every scenario. "What we saw was a situation that was very unsafe," Clattenburg said. "We had a Champions League match between Benfica and Real Madrid, where FIFA and UEFA didnt really like what happened when a player covered their mouth. So certainly they brought in a rule in April, and [it] was quickly implemented in this World Cup that if a player does it in a confrontational way, they will be sent from the way of play." The original incident occurred on April 28 when SL Benfica's Gianluca Prestianni said something to or about Madrid's Vincius Jnior. The Brazil star claimed Prestianni spewed racial slurs, but because he covered his mouth to disguise the message, it was unclear. To prevent that guessing game of wondering what a player said to their opponent in secrecy, FIFA targeted blocking one's mouth when talking, specifically to an opponent. That discretion is important, as teammates or players and their coach can still address one another while blocking their mouths to keep from sharing game plans or tactics with opponents. But when it's a player doing it to an opponent, a red card is awarded as was seen with Almirn. Time-Wasting And Match Flow A few years ago, Clattenburg said, he "wanted the game to be speeded up." That's been addressed in multiple ways at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Players who appear hurt but remain in the match must wait a minute to return to the action as a way to deter faking injuries. Players who take too long to enter or leave the pitch when being substituted in or out will be kept off for a minute. When a goalkeeper takes too long to take a goal kick, it turns into a corner kick. Each of the time quantities are at the referees' discretion. In Morocco's match against Scotland on Friday, referee Ilgiz Tantashev ruled goalkeeper Yassine Bounou's time-wasting antics turned into a Scottish corner. FOX Sports analyst Kasper Schmeichel, a former goalkeeper who won the Premier League with Leicester City, admitted he would waste time setting up for goal kicks and was in favor of these rules. However, he felt it should also apply to set-piece-takers. "Surely, its gotta go both ways," Schmeichel said. "Eventually, it becomes a corner, and they take forever to take the corner." Clattenburg agreed. Certainly there are more changes to come that will impact the flow of matches at future Men's FIFA World Cups. Video Assistant Review The increased responsibilities of the video assistant review system, a.k.a. VAR, have been on display at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. On top of confirming the ball crossing the plane of the goal and fouls, the scenarios can now include who last touched the ball before it went out of bounds for a corner kick or throw in and if a player was in an offside position. That latter addition was certainly relevant to the last U.S. match. When Alex Freeman pounced on a deflection to score America's second goal in the 43rd minute on Friday, it was initially disallowed because the assistant referee's flag was raised. However, the assistant referee wasn't ruling Freeman offside. It was a faulty decision, coming from technological guidance as the assistant referee's arm band buzzed because American striker Folarin Balogun was in an offside position, potentially blocking the vision of Australian goalkeeper Patrick Beach. So the play went to VAR, and, upon review, it was clear Balogun wasn't blocking Beach's view of the ball or from defending the goal. The U.S. was awarded the goal and went on to beat Australia, 2-0. Referee decisions will continue to impact the outcome of matches at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. And it's clear that FIFA has put time and effort into ensuring match-deciding scenarios can be reviewed for accuracy, players are rightfully punished, or not, and matches continue to flow.
Czech
English
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek