Photo by Lauren Leigh Bacho/Getty ImagesPittsburgh Steelers star Aaron Rodgers calls out ESPN for the networks lack of coverage of one of the biggest alleged scandals in the NFL.In about a month or so, the new NFL season will kick off as Aaron Rodgers will return to the league for one final campaign with the Pittsburgh Steelers.Speaking of Rodgers, the 42-year-old recently made headlines during the Pat McAfee Show over his comments about the alleged Dianna Russini scandal with New England Patriots head coach Mike Vrabel.Photo by Mark Alberti/Icon Sportswire via Getty ImagesAaron Rodgers questions ESPNs coverage of Dianna Russini-Mike Vrabel situationFor years, Dianna Russini was among the most trusted NFL insiders out there. Prior to joining The Athletic, Russini earned her bread and butter with ESPN.However, when the story about her alleged affair with Vrabel went viral, ESPN barely covered it, leading to widespread outrage among fans.Now, Rodgers has called out the network during his recent appearance on the Pat McAfee Show.You have literally an individual that used to work at ESPN that covers our league at the highest level, and theres a major scandal, and its just, like, nobody can f______ talk about it, Rodgers said.He added, What are we even doing here? If its affecting certain things, if theres leaks going on, if theres tampering going on, if that person is also an MVP voter and a Coach of the Year voter. How are we allowing these people to have an impact?Considering Russini was a former ESPN employee, the networks tight-lipped stance is certainly concerning, as pointed out by Rodgers.Rodgers seemed ready to go on a massive rant about the alleged scandal, but McAfee quickly changed the subject, showing ESPNs hesitation in covering the Russini story in all its glory.Read more:How Dianna Russini used NFL contacts to get out of driving ticketsNew update reveals major details about Dianna Russinis investigation after Mike Vrabel controversyJason Whitlock labels reporter as original Dianna Russini over Caitlin Clark trade rumor criticism